|
|
Post by ballbuster on Oct 25, 2004 11:21:04 GMT -5
AAAT... another issue na naman yung sa AFP! di lang pala politicians ang corrupt! dapat na nateng palitan yung buong system ng government. and i don't mean a federal type or somethin... i'm thinking major overhaul! naman!!! Lagi na lang may anumalya sa gobyerno natin, magkano na lang yang nkukurakot ng mga tga AFP, hindi lang naman siguro si garcia ang nangungurakot!!! kaya hindi na rin ako umaasang mababayaran nga ang utang ng pilipinas. naalala ko pa yung mga starlet yata yon na nag-eescort service daw, kainis, ayaw pang sabihin kung sinu nga mga politicians na involved nang napaparusahan na. mga nag-papacute lang sa tv. hayyy, doing it for the publicity.. |
|
|
|
Post by masterbather on Nov 30, 2004 6:55:26 GMT -5
heto, mejo sensitive... ballbuster, i really want to hear your answer...
di ba yung 3 issues sa AFP ngayon is 1. kay gen garcia, 2. yung nagshoplift na cadet sa USA and 3. yung sexual harassment sa PMA... i'd like to see your Points of View sa 3rd item.
kasi, 2 sides nakikita ko eh... he'll be reprimanded because a. he is gay or b. he abused cadets. mejo malabo? ganito...
letter A is parang insulto sa macho-shit (pardon the expression) ng PMA and AFP... na lahat, mga lalaking lalaki... matigas, matipuno, matapang. then this gay officer comes along. it could be based on solely his gender preference kaya siya mapaparusahan!
on the other hand, the more sound decision must come from B. that the ACTS against the subordinates were done. there was an abuse of power. yun ang, i think, more substantial...
|
|
|
|
Post by ballbuster on Nov 30, 2004 15:56:35 GMT -5
honestly, ngayon ko lang to nabalitaan. ngayon ko lang nalaman ang tungkol sa number two and three. nakakagulat naman to at kung anu ano na ang anumalya sa PMA at AFP.
okay, so you mean either 2 things ang mangyayari.
a. he'll be reprimanded because of his sexual/gender preference
or
b. "he" abused cadets.
he should be reprimanded, pero anong ibig mong sabihin? sa kung anong dahilan na dapat siyang maparusahan? ewan ko kung may preference ang PMA at AFP na hindi pwede ang mga bakla sa kampo. pero kung mapaparusahan siya solely based on his preference eh kakitiran na yun. ang issue ay yung pang-aabuso at hindi naman ang tunay na pagkatao ng officer.
for me it is just proper that he suffers the consequences for his actions against the cadets.
teka, teka, anu ba, pinagtatalunan ba to ng mga nakakataas?
|
|
|
|
Post by dmartian on Nov 30, 2004 19:30:11 GMT -5
honestly, ngayon ko lang to nabalitaan. ngayon ko lang nalaman ang tungkol sa number two and three. nakakagulat naman to at kung anu ano na ang anumalya sa PMA at AFP. okay, so you mean either 2 things ang mangyayari. a. he'll be reprimanded because of his sexual/gender preference or b. "he" abused cadets. he should be reprimanded, pero anong ibig mong sabihin? sa kung anong dahilan na dapat siyang maparusahan? ewan ko kung may preference ang PMA at AFP na hindi pwede ang mga bakla sa kampo. pero kung mapaparusahan siya solely based on his preference eh kakitiran na yun. ang issue ay yung pang-aabuso at hindi naman ang tunay na pagkatao ng officer. for me it is just proper that he suffers the consequences for his actions against the cadets. teka, teka, anu ba, pinagtatalunan ba to ng mga nakakataas? hi! may i join your discussion? |
|
|
|
Post by dmartian on Nov 30, 2004 19:52:52 GMT -5
anyways, makiki-butt in na lang talaga ako.
that officer who was involved in sexual act w/ the cadets was condemned because of "the act" and not because he is gay. his mistah or classmates had noticed already that he was gay even when he was still in the academy. pero di naman nila sya kinutya. he was doing well naman and posed no treat to them. but when he became an officer and had the privilege of having people to work under him, he abused that power. sabi, he promised these cadets na he could make them pass as soldiers in exchange of sexual favor. he can't get away naman with it kze kitang kita sa video.
i am working in an institution which deals with people who are in this kind of business.
|
|
|
|
Post by marasmus on Dec 1, 2004 1:24:11 GMT -5
hay nako, di ko maiwasang di mag react agad!  yang mga ganyang mga balita ang talaga namang nakakapanginig ng laman sa galet!! alam nyo yon, abusin daw ba ang kapangyarihan??!! samantalahin daw ba ang kahinaan ng kapwa? but the thing is wala ren naman mang-aabuso kung walang pa aabuso diba? i know me reason din naman ang mga kawawang cadets bket sila pumayag but the thing is the end does not justify the means. haay.... buhay nga naman parang life! |
|
|
|
Post by ballbuster on Dec 1, 2004 10:12:08 GMT -5
hi! may i join your discussion? feel free, ANYTIME.  |
|
|
|
Post by ballbuster on Dec 1, 2004 10:31:07 GMT -5
hindi ko kasi alam ang buong story. so may video pa pala. teka, nahuli ba ang video or sumabog ang issue nang may nagreklamo? sa lagay na yan eh, mukhang gusto rin naman cadets.?
see, yun pala at alam na sa kampo na gay itong officer, kung matagal nang alam eh di matagal na yang naparusahan.
|
|
|
|
Post by dmartian on Dec 1, 2004 19:38:42 GMT -5
hindi ko kasi alam ang buong story. so may video pa pala. teka, nahuli ba ang video or sumabog ang issue nang may nagreklamo? sa lagay na yan eh, mukhang gusto rin naman cadets.? see, yun pala at alam na sa kampo na gay itong officer, kung matagal nang alam eh di matagal na yang naparusahan. the issue started sa imbestigador where they'd featured yung expose ng isang cadet na he was forced to have sexual favor sa isang officer in exchange nga of him becoming a soldier. there were videos shown of the actual act. may videos kasi tine-tape daw nung officer yung mga encounters nya. siguro this cadet was able to get these tapes and yun nga ang ginamit nya for the expose. yeah, maybe the cadet like it too kasi kung ayaw mo talaga hindi ka papayag. but maybe, he was forced to do so kasi he thought that eto yung easiest way para maging sundalo sya. hindi naman kasi madaling pumasok sa pagsu-sundalo. madaming requirements. but, hindi nga daw tumupad tong officer. and maybe, me iba syang promises na di nya tinupad kaya nagsumbong sya. well, even he was known to have gay tendency he was not condemned or reprimanded kasi wala wala naman syang ginagawa. even he is still gay up to now kung hindi naman sya gumawa ng ganitong kalaswang(sorry for the term) bagay, he will not be punished. i think, yung pag-imbestiga or pag-akusa sa kanya of act of lasiviousness or immorality is a crime na pwedeng gawin hindi lang ng isang gay kundi ng kahit sinumang individual. ano ba yan... am i getting serious about this? concerned lang ako kasi i have brothers and friends who are military officers. salamat po! |
|
|
|
Post by ballbuster on Dec 2, 2004 12:15:13 GMT -5
true, kung hindi ka papayag eh di walang mangayayari. tsk tsk tsk.. kasi naman, hindi naman lahat ng bagay ay makukuha sa madalian.  |
|
|
|
Post by marasmus on Dec 2, 2004 18:10:17 GMT -5
maiba tayo ng topic, anong masasabi nyo sa pre-nup agreement ni julia roberts sa husband nya?
|
|
|
|
Post by gorgeousbitch on Dec 4, 2004 1:17:18 GMT -5
maiba tayo ng topic, anong masasabi nyo sa pre-nup agreement ni julia roberts sa husband nya? para sa kin di sila bagay nuong guy....yun lang! 
|
|
|
|
Post by ballbuster on Dec 4, 2004 13:21:14 GMT -5
maiba tayo ng topic, anong masasabi nyo sa pre-nup agreement ni julia roberts sa husband nya? uhm is she still with the cameraman? hayyy nako, huli na talaga ako sa mga bali-balita. |
|
|
|
Post by jazzycalizacion on Dec 6, 2004 2:23:42 GMT -5
she gave birth na twins... boy and girl.. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by deepeedeepdeep on Dec 6, 2004 11:08:04 GMT -5
yahaa. hazel yata name nung baby girl.
|
|
yang mga ganyang mga balita ang talaga namang nakakapanginig ng laman sa galet!! 
